|
東莞翻譯公司關鍵字：constitutes a cost, resulting in free water tickets under the "pay" water. Water users and therefore vote for the natural aversion of water is self-evident.
This section discusses only whether the water situation to pay the water vote, on the other side will be discussed in more detail in the next section. Taking into account the ticket collector's attitude, as the case may be: a person of a particular kick for some reason did not vote to pay the water, and the ticket collector who has not been ignored, thus making cross-vote kick other people feel discriminated against. If a person repeatedly observed a similar situation, he will receive votes for amendments to the behavior expected, and may make the Riders kick attempt. When this attempt a number of successful, he will be further revised on the ticket collector's expectations, which led to frequent violations, a model of this behavior will lead others to follow (5).
People vote on the water with water resisted, because it not only can not guarantee access to quality water services, but so are many restrictions, so people are always trying to bring the water system's demise.C, the water supply of people vote for the analysis of attitudes,As the water supply of people, the boiler room on a few other mandatory water (such as water periods, water quantity and quality) is born free water outside the voting system and independent decision.Water were distributed to the number of votes in the hands of the water (and thus the potential amount of water) does not constitute an effective constraint on water supply. Although the water requirements of the provisions kick people that ticket limit clause is intended to ensure steady demand for easy to determine口譯定價標準 the supply, but in fact, supply the right independently to determine口譯定價標準 the amount of water at a level (6). So vote on behalf of water for water rights have little effect, it supports only part of the water who go by the possibility to obtain quantitative water, but if all the ticket holders are strictly strictly by the book, its water rights can be met, but doubtful. Moreover, even if the supply shortage does occur, the water supply of people who can grasp the individual violations of water for an excuse to hit back at those who questioned the water, making water one at a comparative disadvantage.
|