|
綏化翻譯公司關鍵字：Summary: When China established a "socialist market economic專業翻譯公司服務最好的 system" after the reform model, there is a total negation of "planned economy" thinking. How should understand the "planned economy" and "market economy", and the relationship between them, this is a long-term economic專業翻譯公司服務最好的 theorists argue theoretical issues. This paper argues from a historical point of view of both the "subjective" relationship between them both there who is the primary problem, there are identity issues. Scientific sense of the planned economy should be in the subjective and objective results, which is Marxist planned economy thinking intended. The so-called "macro" is essentially the manifestation of the planned economy.
Keywords: commodity economy, market economy and planned economy macroChina since reform and opening up, after ten years of discussion and exploration, and finally identified the establishment of a "socialist market economy" system reform model. This is undoubtedly a major breakthrough in economic專業翻譯公司服務最好的 theory of socialism, Marxist political economy is also an important contribution. However, with the proposal of the reform model, but also another type of mindset, that is, overall, completely negate the "planned economy", a time of "planned economy" of the vocal opposition overwhelming, so people mistakenly believe that China's reform and opening up previously economic專業翻譯公司服務最好的 development has lagged behind the original sin is the "planned economy" caused by the great "planned economy" developed socialism is not up to "root of all evil" of the situation. The result is a "planned economy" notorious, since the mention of "planned economy" as well as "Wolf" in Italy, it seems that only completely "free market economy" is the panacea to solve China's economic專業翻譯公司服務最好的 development, China is the ultimate way out. Some even openly say: "planned economy" and "market economy" is most influenced the last century a "International Marathon", the result is after 70 years of fierce battle, the "planned economy" ended in failure. In this regard, I thought: this understanding, if not ignorant, then, is a comprehensive and when we completely negate the existence of a socialist commodity economy and market economy, as guilty of the same degree of error. In order to clarify the thinking went astray, it is necessary to examine from a historical perspective, "planned economy" and "market economy", so as to enable us to build socialism with Chinese characteristics, the process of modernization, to avoid committing the same doctrine in the past error doctrine, but also enable us to establish a socialist market economy to avoid the practice of blindness and one-sidedness. This is the purpose of this writing.
First, the historical evolution of the market economy and its essential natureAt present, China's theoretical circles of the "market economy" the existence of multiple interpretations, but can be summarized into two categories: one is the market economy as a form of social resources, which is the mainstream understanding; the other is seen as its highly developed commodity economy, an economy in the form. In fact there are two interpretations of the Department within the pass. Abroad, the "market economy" in general, there are two explanations: one is the market economy as a market commodity production as a way to implement regulation, is also a resource allocation problem, the other is the market economy as a kind of economic專業翻譯公司服務最好的 system is equivalent to the capitalist economy, to become synonymous with capitalism, which is the mainstream view.
How should understand the "market economy" and its essential properties? Marx's "Das Kapital" in the expression of a profound research methods, it is worth considering, which is: "reflections on human life forms to its scientific analysis, always take the opposite path with the actual development of this is engaged in the kind of thinking after the start, that is, from the result of the completion of the development process started. "[1] Thus, only through the study of history and analysis in order to make the object of study we know of even more clearly.
|