|
吉安翻譯公司關鍵字：In fact, this top 'capitalist' hat back in the early practice of socialism had been torn. Lenin pointed out, under the Soviet regime of private ownership of non-workers is not a complete economic專業翻譯公司服務最好的 capitalism, but a special form of state capitalism, the "3 / 4 of socialism." ⑨ Obviously, it is simply to put a 'capitalist' hat is no longer appropriate. Mao Zedong's socialist transformation period and played a succession of Lenin's idea. Deng Xiaoping made his opening address at the XII "building socialism with Chinese characteristics" proposition, but is "using capitalism to build socialism" or "destroy capitalism and capitalist" theory frame of mind, a major breakthrough . Later, he also "three capital" enterprises, for example that "some people think that, more of a foreign capital, the more of a capitalist, 'funded' business專業英語翻譯公司科技文件翻譯哪里最好 more than is capitalism, many things, is the development of capital doctrine of these people are not even basic common sense. " He stressed that "'three-owned' enterprises by China's overall political and economic專業翻譯公司服務最好的 conditions." ⑩ being the case, removal of name for their "capital" of the hat is taken for granted.
Thirteenth report to the primary stage of socialism theory provided the basis for the Uncap: revealed in the new economy and private ownership under the conditions of this stage of the internal relations of socialism, that it is with this stage of socialism is compatible , rather than confrontation; that its development is to adapt to the requirements of socialist construction stage, rather than attempt to reflect the restoration of capitalism. According to this theory, the original meaning of the primary stage of socialism is only a developed socialism, but socialism is not nondescript. It is the diversity in the form of ownership, not the messy nature of ownership, not the quality on a variety of incompatible ingredients mixed. So if you do not give the private economy Zhaimao, it can not meet the practical requirements of reform and development, it will also bring about chaos theory. If you still wear the name of its "capital" of the hat, then how can its development as a socialist, not capitalist development? That this historical stage of socialism would not become a component of both the stage of capitalist elements have? Is this not on the back of the "wins" the problem is not resolved in the transition period, what has become a stage of socialism?
Removal of the labor relations to employment-based private ownership economy 'capitalist' hat, also removed the basis of their own labor as a small private economy from the "capital" (or "tail of capitalism) hat.
Is name
|