|
揭陽翻譯公司關鍵字：3, the disciplines of economics, long way to goAlthough 20 years of reform and opening up the overall level of China's economic circles have greatly improved, but in recent years has been their training and overseas and coming back a large number of cutting-edge supplement. However, should also be noted that economists from the ranks of both quantitative terms, or from the quality of it all there are many shortcomings. As China's reform, the rising demand for high economic science, and economics of the new issues emerging, our economic scientists who are also increasingly heavy burden. Here, I would like to take this opportunity to accelerate China's economic and scientific disciplines made the following recommendations:
(1) to strengthen the basic theory of teaching and research.In recent years, according to my professor in the doctoral program and the Academy of Social Sciences in Shanghai, China Europe International Business School (CEIBS) MBA programs teach personal experience, our students have a pursuit of "forward" and ignore the basic tendency to impede their economic theory thorough understanding of the basic analytical tools of economics and correct understanding. Correct this bias is to strengthen basic theoretical research and teaching, and teaching emphasis is placed on basic theory and the importance of basic training.
I would emphasize the microeconomic foundation training. After a full one hundred years of the 20th century, research efforts, modern microeconomics has become a concept is clear, logical science. As an economist, without a solid foundation of microeconomics, their thoughts inevitably confusion. Therefore, I ask their students must learn microeconomics. I discuss the issue with the students, but also special attention from time to time to bring them back to the basic theoretical issues come up. Study economics, the most important thing is to master the world of economists and cognitive thinking. The micro-economics is to learn to grasp such a useful tool for understanding the starting point.
In China's economic circles there are two biased understanding: one is that the 21st century neo-classical economics exhausted the truth microeconomics, economics have to do is put the principles of neoclassical economics, applied directly China's actual top, through a simple derivation can draw the right conclusions. The other is that the latest developments in economics, such as new institutional economics, information economics, and so is more close to reality, so that the old principles of neo-classical economics has become completely obsolete. The latter often do not understand the principles of microeconomics (such as Arrow - Debreu general equilibrium model, Arrow-Debreu Model of General Equilibrium) is under the strict assumptions of the theory of reality to the abstract; in relaxing certain assumptions ( If complete information assumption) the theory of the case reveals a new conclusion, does not mean denial of these principles as a theoretical benchmark (benchmark) the significance of [21]. This bias prevent us from understanding the economic problems of a scientific analysis. For example, the capital market's view is. Some people believe that as long as the stock market liberalization, capital resources will naturally be a valid configuration; and some people say, regardless of the level of stock prices in the short term or long term market speculation are all skills that the level and government policy The size of support, but did not completely follow the law; there are people on different occasions using two alternate theories; caused a lot of confusion.
|