|
萍鄉翻譯公司關鍵字：In a complete system of structure, as between the various institutional arrangements, there is a symbiotic relationship, the existence of some institutional arrangements or other changes will affect the institutional arrangements [4]. In other words, a single out of the institutional arrangements in other appropriate institutional arrangements [5] with the circumstances, it is difficult to function alone, will reduce the efficiency of the system until complete failure. Arguably, the institutional arrangements may be a function of not only their own performance, but also many other institutional arrangements related to the multi-function. We can understand this feature as a symbiosis between the institutional arrangements. We note that, precisely because of this symbiotic existence, those non-continuous intermittent, the time span of the larger reform will sometimes face situations with low efficiency.
Second, the original game and the two parties led by the government in a dilemmaA system of formal structure and informal constraints in determining the binding mechanism is different. Although both are the product of the game, but each point of view, the formal constraints of the external system in the decision, the government played a decisive role is the government giving the sense of the legitimacy of its procedures identified [6]; informal constraints decisions within the system, the more performance for the public's habits, customs and moral standards of inheritance and spontaneous evolution. On the other hand, the public can also decide to impose a formal system of significant impact, it provides support or contradict the formal institutional arrangements of social forces, as mentioned earlier, the system depends on its ability to perform from informal public compatibility constraints, however, when the public face of strong state apparatus, its influence is a certain limit; and informal constraints on the internal government system could implement a significant impact, its main way is to use the mainstream ideology to fix the values ??of the public, but this way there are also the values ??of the audience base and opportunities for participation and other factors, sometimes the government will try to systematic impact on the practice of informal constraints, but because informal constraints and constraints intergenerational inheritance of non-strict nature of such efforts are often not very likely to be successful [7].
System's decision is a game process. In this process, each player tries to maximize revenue, that is, to achieve his best, or, more rationally to achieve the best results for his future state. However, the future of the state by a single individual can not only determine their own actions, each participant select the best course of action depends on the actions of others choices and current status. Participants in the game system is interactive and endogenous equilibrium, is a self-enforcing process [8]. However, we believe, even if the rules of the game is endogenous institutional change, not necessarily everyone will participate in the new equilibrium during the game, most people will be enjoying the new system of production, there are always a few people most of the They should participate in the game the cards, that representative democracy in modern society. Absolute average game opportunities for participation in the original state of society will occur. At the other extreme, one determination of the absolute rules of the game's system of non-generation mechanism will only occur in a highly centralized monarchy of social status. Representative in the strict sense, most of the game the new system is not directly involved in the process of the public, as the commissioning party of its own powers, have reason to trust the right agent can only communicate their preferences, and make efforts to help the commissioning party, And in the matter and after adequate mechanisms to ensure that, as ineffective for the failure of the agents are eligible to be held until the abolition of the power of the agent. However, the lack of democratic consciousness in society, due to the dominant position of the commissioning party for their own lack of knowledge in the name of the agent side of disregard for the will of the commissioning party and the principal - agent channels of institutional barriers and other reasons, the principal - agent mechanism is not ideal to be effective, so the new system during the game appeared in another form, that is controlled by a small number of core power, adhering to the concept of elite political thinking, with its complete rational self-confidence, to take that type of new system implementation, before the new system with the public on the feasibility and effect of the game, and because there are obvious differences between strong and weak position, after the public response is not sufficient to completely overthrow the already implemented the system, usually only from the power system repair or system-level remedy, which constitutes the basic logic of progressive reform.
Chinese market in the early stages of system changes on their way to a series of road and its game system, which can be abstracted as a participant in the two parties - the government and the public [9]. But the two decisions in the system, the role played by the initiative vary widely. In the constitutional system of constraints, the public through the election as its spokesperson on behalf of the People's Congress in advance of the game. However, we note that the idea due to the long detention, the majority of the public market concept for the lack of basic knowledge, while civil rights for its own strange, so we have reason to believe that this game will not advance and then the system determines that any substantial impact. Under the Constitution, the legal system, the decision by the National People's Congress Standing Committee and made during the recess. Thus, the participants set things in the game was set in the People's Congress, the report says. As the two (the NPC and CPPCC) are often held after the Congress, a combination of optional strategy game set in advance will be limited to the will of the government within the scope of government officials in the National People's Congress and because the absolute influence, the government The National People's Congress meeting in advance will be able to achieve a more consistent identity to form the text of the formal system. With the idea of ??game theory can be expressed as, game participants on the pre-set by the General Assembly's strategy to make the necessary combination of cognitive coordination, so the game can be a lower cost converges to equilibrium. A game for any participant i, have Ui (Si *, S-i *) ≥ Ui (Si, S-i *), then S *= (S1 *, S2 *, ..., Sn *) is satisfied What is a balanced strategy (Zhang Bridge, 2001). From any participant will not take the initiative to deviate from the results of state point of view, something easy to get in the game Nash equilibrium. System passed, the Government will
|