|
盤錦翻譯公司關鍵字：IntroductionAfter the founding of New China, China theorists attitude towards Marxist theory, is surprisingly similar to "54" campaign before the people's attitude towards the theory of Confucius - a Confucian only use all the holes holy as the criterion, superstition, myth , anti-science.
China's problem is that economics and anti-science "Kongsheng Fan-style", rather than Mr. Fan Gang said, "Soviet paradigm ', that is, Marxist political economy of superstition, myth, all the Marx standard, to Marx labor theory of value as the standard, and put everything right or that the correct economic theory said as Marxist economics, but all is not correct or incorrect economic theories that say that as of this non-Marxist economics kind of paradigm. Nearly ten years ago by Mr. Fan Gang, "" Soviet paradigm of criticism, "" caused by "Whither China economics" discussion, and did not find the right way to the Chinese economy.
Marx's theory of "Kong Shengfan style" is not only China (mainland) economic practice and economic theory, development of resistance, but also China (mainland) all other areas of the main obstacles to move forward.
AThe nineties, namely in 1996, China (mainland) economics session of the elite, who had launched a "Whither China economics" discussion, allegedly, this discussion is Because Mr. Fan Gang, "" Soviet paradigm of criticism "" caused.
When the background is that China's economic reform has been carried out for nearly two decades, economic theory is far behind in economic practice, theorists believe that the traditional economic theory (Mr. Fan Gang called "Soviet paradigm ') serious constraints study of China's economic theory and economic practice. The traditional economic theory can not guide our practice of reform and opening up the economy, can not explain the reality of a variety of economic phenomena. Meanwhile, from 1979 to 1989, the theorists for a large number inconsistent with traditional economic theory point of view, variety, try it, seems to want to break the shackles of the traditional theory of articles.
According to statistics, the discussion of the results (more mainstream view) is that the future direction of Chinese economics, to adhere to Marxist political economy of the basic ideas and basic principles as a guide, the absorption of modern Western economics, science and useful things , combined with the reality of China's economic practices, development of China's economics.
In fact, Marxist economics, Marxist labor theory of value system that, ultimately absolute dominance. This discussion is not for the Chinese economy to find the right direction.
Looking back at the economics of the past 20 years, since that is the history of economic reform, you can see, we have experienced three periods. The first period, that the above-mentioned 1979-1989 "quasi-philosophers" period. During this period, thought very active, there has been a variety of perspectives, there is a new interpretation of Marx's political economy, there are various schools of economics of copying the West, there is the interpretation of Western economics, but also have their own "innovation" self-made, even non-economics, "economics" view (such as a philosophical sense, the meaning of the concept of value management to explain the value of economics, etc.), variety, Nishajuxia. The second period is from 1990 to 2001, between the large-scale introduction of Western economic theory period. Marked by the introduction of the implementation of market economic theory. This period of traditional economic theory, Marxist labor theory of value system that was set aside. As rural areas of Guangdong Pearl River Delta, massive construction projects, construction of new buildings everywhere, and its the same next to the old ancestral remains unchanged. The third period that is 2001 to now for the "deepening of labor and labor value" period. This period is the shine in the market when economic theory, think of the traditional economic theory. Guangdong Pearl River Delta as a large number of new houses built in rural areas, the thought of building materials to use modern new look next to the renovation of old temples, like (this is just refurbished, redecorated and not demolished for redevelopment). "Deepening of labor and labor value" is the result of re-confirm the status of the traditional labor theory of value system. That the market economic theory, utility theory of value system that is the theory, although the shine in the economic practice, this does not affect, nor shake the dominance of labor theory of value system, because the "labor theory of value and utility theory of value is connected , "" labor theory of value with the value of the effective theory of hidden meaning. " Former incompatible to each other a pair of rivals today Renjieguizong, the same as the one! This will form the economic situation of tigers Tibetan mountain. It seems a "value" has two answers, there are two different interpretations. In fact, the deepening of research on the labor theory of value and did not reach a deeper, more correct understanding, but only a few more errors of interpretation of Bale.
|