|
呼和浩特翻譯公司關鍵字：Marxist economics and bourgeois economics, respectively, on two different ideologies as the whole itself is mutually exclusive. But that does not mean that their specific content and conclusions, and always are in conflict. Which indeed contains many of the same or similar place. Because no matter how the two described their economics, but their study is the same. "Production in general" and "human society in general" can have only one; "capitalist society" or "bourgeois production" of human society as a special type of production process can have only one; China's "socialist society and its primary stage ", as well as China's" socialist market economy ", and only one. So, I think, Marxist economics and economics of these two bourgeois "economics" the antagonism between bourgeois economics is mainly present in those contained in the "special ideological bias" on. Specifically, I think, which also includes two aspects:
First, there are all kind of bourgeois economists bourgeois ideological bias.That is, these bourgeois economists (whether it is "scientific" or "classic" or "vulgar" and "contemporary"), in which they live that "bourgeois society" as is the norm in human society, thus bringing this community in the abstract or recorded some of the theories, categories or concepts, said to be as eternal as the laws of nature. Western economics in the so-called "economic man" and "assumption" is a prominent example. In the Marxist view of economics, which is the result of a number of large and small, "the public", or "assets" (in German Bürger, the equivalent of the English and French in the bourgeois). This "assumption" (strictly speaking, is "abstract"), for those in the private ownership of goods in the economy or the capitalist mode of production activities of the large and small, private (ie, Marx called "the private self-interest") is , is an objective, correct and effective. However, it extended to "all social beings," which exposed the total of all the bourgeois economists the kind of "narrow horizon of bourgeois" limitations. This means that, in their view, in addition to bourgeois society and bourgeois mode of production other than not there will be any other socio-economic patterns, both before and after this, are true.
Second, the bourgeois vulgar economics have, different forms of vulgarity, that is the kind of superficial criticism of Marx, defense and conciliatory.
Comparing the two, I think the former is more dangerous. Because in our country, its people's world outlook, outlook on life, values, and so has a very important role in corrosion, will confuse people's minds, and thus do harm to our country's socialist economic system or economic system (in German and English System, Russia Man Систима), obstruction of China's reform and opening up and modernization along the socialist path. The vulgar of vulgar economics, the other way is easier to identify. And this is also not all bourgeois economists have and are appreciated.
(F) To promote study hard, study hard and rigorous scholarship of a good style of study.In the ideology which also includes people's style and study style. Comrade Mao Zedong in Yan'an rectification campaign has sharply criticized some of our comrades in the revolutionary ranks in bad style and study style. In recent years, our theoretical study of economics, there are also a number of such bad style of study. In my opinion, the current performance of the more prominent, first in total disregard of China's primary stage of socialism and its largest national conditions and practice, consciously or unconsciously, to so-called "developed market
|