昭通翻譯公司關鍵字:Shijian Yun in " revelations," a text, the book of Revelation to the Chinese scholar summarized the six, he thought the book "the most valuable of all is the East-West comparison, in the range of factors the comparison process, the authors of the history of China made a lot of economic and political phenomena with different views on the traditional concept of academic community, enlightening. "but in my opinion, scholars astray in the study of economic history, in largely because of this "factor comparison method." If you do not understand the economic and social operation of the basic principles, but only committed to "a number of factors more", it is difficult to have anything enlightening. Chinese scholars in the book resonate, it does not show that the book has a profound thought or insights, but rather exposed the ignorance and shallowness of Chinese scholars only. Told me that the author was just sensational conclusion, it is enough to make serious scholars did not hesitate to put it into the heap of waste paper, anyway, let me see I do not see. Because of this, I say to those hard to accept the "Great Divergence" point of view, but to have patience and read it with deep respect for the scholars, but I really do not have this extraordinary willpower.
Finally, and perhaps the need for "Western-centric" to talk about my views. It is said that the academic world is an important task is to get rid of "Western-centric" effect, and Huang, Pomeranz are all out of "Western Center on" the impact of the valuable efforts, it has been the academic extol. To be honest, I still do not know "Western Center on" what is the exact meaning, only know about China or respected scholars in China there is a kind of "Western-centric," the feeling of resentment, some people even believe that Smith, Marx, Weber, North, who argued the problem is the basis of "Western-centric," or at least have a "Western-centric" tendency. If the master of the human mind works are included, "Western-centric" tendency, we can feel about it? Told me that we should first of the "Western-centric" to give a clear definition of the "what" questions to find out. Specifically, it should first find out whether the world really exist in modern times has been a center; if there is a center, then the originator to the world from Europe and the gradual expansion of modernization (modernization) process, whether that is the modern Western world since the as the center; if Europe is really the center of the world in modern times, then to Europe made by the community-based social science theory, can not be called "Western-centric," we can not create fundamentally different from the Western social science theories ; if simply impossible to create a scientific theory is different from Western society, so that "Western-centric" What is the role, "Western Center on" What harm in itself, is not a critical need in the critical re-established on the basis of a corresponding "Oriental (Chinese) central theory"?
In economics, it seems, the principle of development and progress of human society are the same everywhere. Western natural science and social science achievement in the development process of human society a great achievement, it can not be artificially divided into "Western" and "Oriental." It is man-made "Western-centric" and "China-centered" theory in the social sciences has caused confusion, so that scholars of the energy spent in doing nothing to quarrel.
Abstract: The Party Congress, to the northeast old industrial base to support the adjustment and adaptation strategies and gradual implementation of the agenda. However, how to understand "Northeast Phenomenon" because, how to promote the transformation of old industrial bases in Northeast, upgrading and industrial revitalization, described as "benevolent see benevolence and the wise see wisdom." This paper from the perspective of innovation cluster to cluster innovation of competitive advantages, the northeast old industrial base in the industry status quo and as because the basic point to explore the transformation of old industrial bases in Northeast and industrial upgrading problems and propose appropriate countermeasures recommendations.
|